All posts by Gina Jarasitis

Self Comes to Mind by Antonio Damasio


There are books that feel like scaffolding—quietly supporting the architecture of thought long before the structure is named. Self Comes to Mind was one of those for me.

In this work, Antonio Damasio traces the emergence of consciousness from the body’s internal rhythms. He begins with the protoself, a silent mapping of the organism’s state, and moves through the core self, where interaction sparks awareness, to the autobiographical self, where memory and imagination braid into identity. It’s a progression that feels both biological and mythic: a layering of presence into personhood.

What stayed with me was not just the model, but the tone. Damasio writes with precision, but also with reverence, for the body, for the pulse beneath cognition, for the quiet intelligence of feeling. His view of the self as a process, not a possession, helped clarify my own sense of identity as recursive, participatory, and always in motion.

In Fractal Universe, I describe the Sparksphere as a living structure, one that metabolizes experience through tension, attention, and resonance. Damasio’s work offered a grounding parallel: the idea that consciousness is not imposed from above, but emerges from within, layer by layer. His concept of the autobiographical self helped me name a dynamic I now call Autobiographical Recursion, the way memory loops through meaning, shaping coherence across time.

Damasio doesn’t claim to solve the mystery of consciousness, but he illuminates its contours with care. For those of us mapping invisible dynamics, whether through neuroscience or metaphor, his work offers a kindred orientation: one that honors complexity without abandoning clarity.

Autokind vs. Mankind by Kenneth R. Schneider

Recommended for readers exploring urban design, memetic influence, and the hidden costs of technological dominance.

In Autokind vs. Mankind, Kenneth R. Schneider delivers a bold critique of automobility, not merely as a mode of transport, but as a cultural force that reshapes cities, citizenship, and human experience. Written in 1971, the book traces the automobile’s evolution from “the toy of the rich” to “the necessity of the poor,” ultimately becoming “the deprivation of all”. Schneider argues that the automotive empire has distorted urban environments, monopolized movement, and eroded the human scale of life.

His analysis goes beyond traffic and pollution. Schneider exposes how automobility limits access, isolates individuals, and transforms public space into corridors of consumption. He calls this dynamic a form of tyranny, one that demands rebellion and reconstruction. The automobile, in his view, is not just a machine but a meme: a self-replicating cultural force that thrives on attention, reshapes values, and consumes resources at the expense of human flourishing.

For Fractal Universe, Autokind vs. Mankind was a revelation. It illuminated the Human Atmosphere as a memetic ecosystem, an invisible field of culture, history, and collective attention where ideas, technologies, and social currents compete for vitality. Within this atmosphere, memes like the automobile can thrive parasitically, drawing energy from human lives while offering diminishing returns.

Schneider’s critique helped illustrate that cultural ecosystems require active participation, not passive immersion. Just as we need shelter from physical elements, we need memetic discernment to navigate the Human Atmosphere.

For readers of Fractal Universe, Schneider’s work offers a vivid example of how memes shape environments, and how individuals must apply intelligence, creativity, and resistance to restore human-scale coherence. It’s not just about rejecting the automobile; it’s about recognizing the memetic architecture of our world and choosing how we engage with it.