Autokind vs. Mankind by Kenneth R. Schneider

Recommended for readers exploring urban design, memetic influence, and the hidden costs of technological dominance.

In Autokind vs. Mankind, Kenneth R. Schneider delivers a bold critique of automobility, not merely as a mode of transport, but as a cultural force that reshapes cities, citizenship, and human experience. Written in 1971, the book traces the automobile’s evolution from “the toy of the rich” to “the necessity of the poor,” ultimately becoming “the deprivation of all”. Schneider argues that the automotive empire has distorted urban environments, monopolized movement, and eroded the human scale of life.

His analysis goes beyond traffic and pollution. Schneider exposes how automobility limits access, isolates individuals, and transforms public space into corridors of consumption. He calls this dynamic a form of tyranny, one that demands rebellion and reconstruction. The automobile, in his view, is not just a machine but a meme: a self-replicating cultural force that thrives on attention, reshapes values, and consumes resources at the expense of human flourishing.

For Fractal Universe, Autokind vs. Mankind was a revelation. It illuminated the Human Atmosphere as a memetic ecosystem, an invisible field of culture, history, and collective attention where ideas, technologies, and social currents compete for vitality. Within this atmosphere, memes like the automobile can thrive parasitically, drawing energy from human lives while offering diminishing returns.

Schneider’s critique helped illustrate that cultural ecosystems require active participation, not passive immersion. Just as we need shelter from physical elements, we need memetic discernment to navigate the Human Atmosphere.

For readers of Fractal Universe, Schneider’s work offers a vivid example of how memes shape environments, and how individuals must apply intelligence, creativity, and resistance to restore human-scale coherence. It’s not just about rejecting the automobile; it’s about recognizing the memetic architecture of our world and choosing how we engage with it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *