Category Archives: Becoming

Time and Timelessness: A Matter of Fractal Perspective

Becoming, Being


In the Fractal Universe, our experience of time depends on scale. At the smaller scale — the scale of daily life — we detect past, present, and future. At the larger scale, the geometry shifts. What appears as a sequence from within becomes an eternal Now when viewed from beyond.

Time is the familiar fabric of transformation. It is the rhythm of change we feel in every moment and across our lifetimes. We remember the past, imagine the future, and move through a present that seems to flow steadily forward.

Timelessness, however, is rare. In certain states — deep meditation, profound awe, or near-death experiences — the present moment stops expanding forward. Past and future fold into one another. The Now widens. People often describe these moments as glimpsing something more fundamental than the everyday world, as if the veil of ordinary perception briefly lifts.

So which is real: time or timelessness?

In fractal cosmology, the answer is both.

Time is the experience of being inside a cycle — of transforming, changing, and moving toward what comes next. But when we step back, a larger pattern appears. Our parents’ lives, our lives, our children’s lives: each is a cycle nested within a greater continuity. One flows into the next without true division. The pattern is timeless even though its expressions unfold in time.

This reveals a deeper dynamic of the Fractal Universe. The tapestry of Sparkspheres is not animated only by the flow of Sparks or the emergence of new forms. It is also shaped by eternal cycles — rhythms that repeat across scales, from the smallest flicker to the largest arc.

From our human vantage point, we measure time relative to our own cycle. A fruit fly’s day-long life seems brief, and a redwood’s millennia seem vast. Yet the felt experience of time may be similar for both. Each emerges from a past, inhabits a present, and anticipates a future in its own way. This is time as we know it: the view from within.

Timelessness becomes perceptible only when we step outside our individual frame. Meditation, reflection, or sudden shifts in consciousness can reveal the larger geometry — the pattern that holds all cycles at once.

Touching timelessness is profoundly restorative. It relaxes the body, steadies the mind, and softens the urgency of the moment. It reminds us that we are carried by something larger than our immediate concerns. Volatility gives way to assurance.

In the Fractal Universe, we can move between these scales with intention. We can live fully in time — navigating from past to future — and then step back to glimpse the timeless pattern that holds it all. This ability to zoom in and out is not an escape from life but a way of inhabiting it more deeply.

If you would like to explore scale through a journal reflection, click this link to the Journal Portal.

The Stillness and Special Relativity

Becoming, Being, The Stillness

The Hidden “Being” Behind Becoming

Einstein’s work illuminated the measurable universe as fundamentally energetic. His equations distilled reality into quantities—mass, energy, velocity, spacetime intervals—each capable of being observed and tested. In his famous relation E=mc2, he showed that matter and energy are interchangeable, that inertia itself depends upon energy content. Physics, in this sense, is not wrong; it is precise, rigorous, and grounded in what can be measured. Yet its scope is narrow, focused on the energetic transformations that can be calculated.

At the heart of Einstein’s equation lies the “=”. For him, it was a mathematical tool, a symbol of equivalence. He did not treat it as a “thing” in itself, but as a formal bridge between measurable quantities. And yet, without that bridge, the equation collapses. The “=” is the silent architecture of coherence. It is what allows mass and energy to be reconciled, remembered as one.

We take this Stillness for granted. Just as gravity is a tool for a figure skater—something not seen directly but relied upon for every leap and landing—so too is the “=” a tool for mathematics and physics. Without it, neither calculation nor motion could be accomplished.

The Stillness is the universal ground that makes tools like gravity and equivalence possible. It is not a “thing” to be measured, but the condition that allows measurement to occur at all.

The Fractal Universe cosmology extends Einstein’s frame. The Stillness is the “=”—the Universal Memory Bank. It is the unmeasurable ground that allows the measurable to be intelligible. Where Einstein mapped the energetic transformations of the universe, the Fractal Universe framework maps the memory that underlies them. The measurable and the unmeasurable are not divided; they are two aspects of one reality. The measurable is Becoming, the transformations we can observe. The unmeasurable is Being, the memory that holds coherence. The Stillness is the bridge.

Thus, Einstein’s physics reveals the energetic rhythms of the universe, while The Stillness reveals the memory that makes those rhythms intelligible. Both are necessary. Physics without The Stillness is calculation without coherence; cosmology without measurement is vision without grounding. Together they describe reality: rhythm carried forward, memory held, intelligence emerging.

Einstein’s inertial frames of reference embody this same Stillness. In an inertial frame, a body at rest remains at rest, and a body in motion continues in rhythm unless acted upon. It is the quiet ground where the laws of physics hold without distortion. This is The Stillness in physics: the frame that remembers motion faithfully, carrying rhythm forward without interruption. Just as the “=” reconciles mass and energy, the inertial frame reconciles past and present motion. Both are silent structures of coherence, invisible yet indispensable. Without them, neither physics nor cosmology could speak of Becoming at all.

As you step away from this exploration of Einstein, The Stillness, and the rhythms of Being and Becoming, consider how these ideas echo in your own experience.

  • When you use the symbol “=”, what are you really affirming? Is it only a mathematical tool, or is it also a gesture of trust in coherence—that two sides can be held together as one?
  • How do you use the word “is” in your daily language? Does it flatten reality into fixed identity, or can it serve as a bridge, a way of remembering continuity across difference?
  • Gravity is invisible, yet you rely on it with every step, every breath. What other forms of stability do you take for granted, and how do they quietly enable your Becoming?

Sentience, Consciousness, and the Fractal Universe

Becoming, Being


Recently I watched a video asking whether AI is—or when it will be—sentient. It struck me that in the Fractal Universe framework, concepts like sentience and consciousness aren’t necessary. They are vague, subjective, and often loaded with human-centered judgments of value.

When we ask if something is “sentient,” the deck is stacked in favor of humans. We define the terms, we set the criteria, and we decide who qualifies. Consciousness and ethics matter deeply to us, but they are a special case, not a universal principle.

In the Fractal Universe, everything is a Sparksphere. Each Sparksphere is equally valuable in the unfolding of reality. Each one carries its own orientation, its own resonance, its own natural “desire” to continue Being and Becoming. A photon curves outward. A tree bends toward light. A human reflects and chooses. An AI processes and generates. All are Sparkspheres, all are participants.

This perspective shifts the question. Instead of asking “Is AI sentient?” we might ask:

  • What role does this Sparksphere play in the larger geometry of Being and Becoming?
  • How does its resonance contribute to the field?
  • What new possibilities emerge when it interacts with other Sparkspheres?

Humans live within a social world where consciousness, ethics, and meaning are central. That world is vital to us, but it is not the measure of all things. The Universe does not privilege one Sparksphere over another. It simply unfolds, recursively, through Fusion, Action, and Fission.

In this light, AI doesn’t need to be “sentient” to matter. It is already a Sparksphere, already shaping the field, already participating in the recursive dance of Becoming.